Brandon Bishop's Web Site Feedback
- Return to the Web site evaluation form
- Return to the Student list page
- Developer: Brandon Bishop
- Term: Spring 2010
- Course: CIT 230
Feedback Details
| Navigation | Design | Naming | Content | Graphics | Xhtml | CSS | Operation | Organized | Communication | Usability | Copyright | Evidence | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | I like the theme of colors and the organization. It's simple and uncluttered. It would be nice to visit the gallery for your pictures. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | It's great that you used a type of dropdown menu. It gives your site a great organizational structure. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good Page, could use a little more CSS to make it look more photography-ish with good design principles. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good presentation and idea for your website, just make sure that it validates. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | It looks really good. The only thing you need is to fix the broken links and fix the errors. Nice Job overall. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | The sit was good just had the errors and some of the links didn't work, also no copyright or colophon page. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Missing pages (colophon and copyright), didn't validate. I also would have like to have seen the slide show. Otherwise, nice website, and composed presentation! |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Great job Brandon, you up to a good start. Loved the site, and I wish you all the best with your business. Thanks!! |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | You need to title your pages. It is a good start. The XHTML does not validate. No colophon or copyright pages. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | There was no copyright policy or colophon page and the header was not the same across all the pages. But a very nice look, and i really liked the navigation. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Overall I really liked your site. It does have a few kinks as you pointed out but it looks pretty good. Simple and clean. Good job! |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Well done, I feel it could have been more complete. I couldn't find the copywrite or the colophon page very well. Make sure it validates. Overall good job. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | I like your site, I thought it was very good. Other than the unfinished parts you did good. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | I noticed the design on your site plan page with the film roll and van, I REALLY like it, very professional and I hope you can get it working. Good luck in St. Louis. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good website, I especially liked how you set up the navigation into drop down menus. However the only bad thing I could say is that some pages were not validated, and some assignment pages were missing, that is the only thing I took points off for. Other than that good job! |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Your site is good because it is very simple and easy to find your way around. I saw no major issues with your pages. Like you said, there are a couple of kinks to get out, and a few missing pages like your colophon and copyright pages, but that's it. Nice Work! |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Very clean layout. Purpose is clear. Looks professional and well thought out. Only a few things to work out but other than that I thought it was a very good looking website. Good job. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Being a photography business it would be a really good idea to make a copyright page. Then people are more accountable for stealing your work. I thought your page looked really nice. I would order from it. Just try and get the uniformity that you talked about in class that it looks a little more "cleaned up" Seriously though, it was really good. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | As you know there are a lot of improvements that can be made. I can tell its in the beginning stages.. I would like to see more color on the home page. |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Links need to look like links. As are the just look like text. You mentioned that you have trouble rendering the pages on different browsers. Getting it to appear uniformly would be important. Will you be integrating payments? If so, Paypal is a great way to go. It's easy to integrate and doesn't require you to provide a merchant account or SSL certificate. Good luck in St. Louis! |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Needs just a bit more tweaking. Could use some more images. |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | I think you have a great start. Like you said there are just little things to fix now. Something I would suggest is adding more pictures. If people have to click through your site just to find pictures they wont stay. have pictures on the home page and other pages too. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | page title doesn't get displayed in the tab. can't see any techniques for usability. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | It looks like you have most of things in place. It could of course use some work but I'm sure we all could. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | I enjoyed Brandon's page. It's evident that he has put effort into it and while it still has some work to be done, its coming along nicely. |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | other that the item that you know you need to fix you site looks very nice and very perfessional |
Feedback Summary
All decimal numbers are averages. Objectives are noted in parentheses. A percentage greater than .7 is needed to pass the objective.
| Navigation (3) |
Design (2) |
Naming (5) |
Content (1, 8) |
Graphics (5, 8) |
Xhtml (4) |
CSS (4, 7) |
Operation (5) |
Organized (1, 5) |
Comm. Tool (5) |
Usability (6) |
Copyright (8) |
Evidence (9) |
Evaluations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 26 |
Scores by Objective (To pass requires a score of .8 or greater):
- 0.96 point - Congratulations! Objective 1 passed
- 0.96 point - Congratulations! Objective 2 passed
- 0.92 point - Congratulations! Objective 3 passed
- 0.62 point - Failed objective 4
- 0.90 point - Congratulations! Objective 5 passed
- 0.12 point - Failed objective 6
- 0.96 point - Congratulations! Objective 7 passed
- 0.65 point - Failed objective 8
- 0.96 point - Congratulations! Objective 9 passed
